Showing posts with label audrey hepburn. Show all posts
Showing posts with label audrey hepburn. Show all posts

Ain't it obvious already that we love Audrey Hepburn.  This is one of her great movies as she won an Academy Award for Best Actress for her role as Princess Ann.

Movie starts off with the royal Princess Ann being on an official goodwill tour of Europe, where she attended various ceremonies in behalf of her country.  Rome was her last stop, she was already tired of the tour.  She saw some people dancing below her window and she wished she could join them.  Being a princess she was stuck with her bedroom.  Her aide then proceeded to remind her of their next day's schedule when she snapped.  She had a small nervous breakdown and her doctor gave her some sedatives.  Thinking that she was asleep, they left her alone.  She then escaped from her room and wanders around Rome.

The story then progresses when she was met by Joe Bradley (played by Gregory Peck), who is a reporter for the American News Service.  Bradley did not disclose his work to the princess so that he can gather information for a story that will give him a big payday.  All she was was a story in the beginning until he fell in love with Princess Ann.  In the end, he ditches the article and informs his editor he doesn't have it.

In the end Princess Ann returns to her duties and when she met with the Press, Joe Bradley was there and she was shocked.  Joe then put her fears to rest when he had a chance to talk to her amidst all the other press people.  Joe's photographer, Irving (played by Eddie Albert) was also at the press conference and gave her the pictures of her "tour" of Rome.

Princess Ann then thanked everyone of the press who were there and turned around and walked away.  Likewise Joe walked alone from the press conference.

Although this one did not have happy ending, it was a delightful movie to watch.  We can understand why Hepburn won an Academy Award here as she was great at being an innocent princess who sneaked out of her royal duties to be a commoner for a change.  

We had a young Hepburn here, looking sweet and delightful to watch.  She simply lights up the movie with her screentime.  The movie is about her so expect much of her in the entire film.  Can't complain here.

The production was also decent enough to feature much of Rome's features and although they may have "cheated" with the brief tour of the other European nations, we couldn't care less as we expected much of Rome anyway.  The market scene, the crowd, the carabinieri or italian police made up for a truly wonderful roman experience.  We love rome and its nice to see it in black and white and with less people that is.

Gregory Peck was in his usual handsome form and was great in pretending he is not a reporter to Hepburn.  His actions were appropriate to the scenes but we can't say that he excelled herein.  It was Hepburn who shined and thanks to his performance, he added that needed boost to bolster Hepburn's character to the hilt.  So we applaud also his performance here.  We also can't discount Eddie Albert's acting here.  He was great as that hired photographer and he had lots of screen time here as well.

As we have started to review movies of this era, we noticed that story telling during this time was very much in the early stages if we compared it to modern times.  This was mostly done by dialogues and not much of visual renderings, except for the location scene.  Unlike the movie Charade, this was less of the dialogues and we appreciate the different style used in this one.  We loved this movie more than Charade although we can't endear to the love angle between Peck and Hepburn.  We simply can't relate to the fact they can be indeed lovers here in the story.  She may have been young compared to Peck (15 year age gap) and Cary Grant (25 year age difference in Charade), but she had more chemistry with Cary Grant on screen as per our opinion.

In summary, we have read many great things about Roman Holiday and how glad we watched other classics prior to this movie.  Story telling was very much different and when we compare Roman Holiday with the films in the 1950s and 60s, we can say that this was unique for this era.  A lovely film to begin with, a simple story with simple twists, story telling kept on a steady pace, although with an ending we didn't like, other than the last one, we liked it.

Sadly its not being shown anymore in Netflix but with little research on our part, you watch this streaming on Amazon Prime.  You may also watch a cut of version (split into 13 parts) on YouTube.  Simply click on the thumbnail below.



We are itching for a holiday - Roman Holiday (1953)

Read More


We are going classic again with our favorite actress, Audrey Hepburn as Reggie Lampert who lives in Paris and starts in the movie on a skiing holiday.  She had plans of divorcing her husband once she returns to Paris, only to find their apartment bare.  A police officer explained to her that her husband was found dead and that he sold all their things inside the apartment prior to his death.  The police asked about the money from the sale but Reggie doesn't know anything about it.  The police also gave her husband's bag with his things including multiple passport with different names and nationalities and some stuff.

Seeing that Reggie does not have anything to do with her husbands death, she was let go and she was able to arrange for the wake of her husband.  Three men showed up to pay their respects and then she received a letter summoning her for a meeting with CIA Administrator Hamilton Bartholomew (played by Walther Matthau). Bartholomew then confided with Reggie that the three men at the wake were her husband's buddies that stole USD250,000 from the US Government.  He also warned Reggie that the three men thinks she has the money and that she is in great danger.

To allay her fears, she calls upon Peter Joshua (played by Cary Grant), whom she met during her holidy, to help her get a hotel room. He eventually played as her bodyguard of sorts protecting her from the three men who are after her.  It turned out that Peter Joshua is in cahoots with those who are after the money and his real name is Carson Dyle.  Reggie learned about this but she still trusts Peter now Carson.  

While the story moved on, still on the trail of the money, one by one, the three men died in different situations.  Reggie suspected Peter who was Carson and now Adam Canfield who killed them all.  She phoned Bartholomew about it and she instructs Reggie to meet him at the Colonnade at the Palais-Royal.  On her wait to the meet, Peter aka Carson aka Adam gave chase and she got in between Bartholomew and Adam.  It turned out that Barholomew is Carson Dyle and he was the one killed the three men and now he is after the money.  Adam eventually saves Reggie and the next day they bring the money (treasure) to return to the embassy when suddenly Reggie learns that Peter aka Carson aka Adam is really Brian Cruikshank, a government officer tasked to recover the stolen money.  His true identity now in the open for Reggie, Brian then proposes marriage to Reggie and she kisses him.

A happy ending for an almost confusing number of changing identities.  Maybe this was the main reason for the movie title.  Charades.  As per the dictionary, it is an absurd pretense intended to create a pleasant or respectable appearance.  Cary Grant had 4 name changes while Walter Matthau had just one.  These two gave an appearance of being nice guys to Reggie with the objective of getting the stolen money.  

Cary Grant had it easy with Reggie being handsome and suave.  Every time he changes  his identity from Peter to Carson to Adam to Brian, he is forgiven and Reggie still trusts him.  This might have turned us off but we love Audrey Hepburn as this naive unsuspecting widow, who gets smitten with Cary Grant.  Who wouldn't.  Reggie made it known in most  parts of the film that she is smitten with Grant's colorful character.

We admit, that even with the age gap between them,  they look good together.  Hepburn throws herself literally at Grant, but being a perfect gentleman, he brushes off her approaches.  Maybe this endeared upon Hepburn's character, making her love him more each time a new identity was discovered.

This film was made in 1963 so story telling then was very much different.  Here we don't see an elaborate character development so we were kept guessing with Cary Grant's character.  Reggie as a widow also had none so we were wonder beyond our imagination, how could have have married her husband whom he only knew his name.  She didn't know how much money they had, what was his job, why would she marry him?  Thankfully we did skip this and focused more on the story.

Film in the 1960's were mostly talking so bear with the back and forth question and answer situations.  It is as if they were just reading off a page in the book the movie was based on.  Thankfully Hepburn was a darling here and we love her every time she comes on screen. We can forgive the slow pace and the dialogues.   Cary Grant is suave as ever, acting wise, he was just cruising along with Hepburn.  Nothing exemplary, but was just right. He might not have shined here but he was an eye candy for us when standing beside Hepburn.

Another point to watch this film is the presence of well known celebrities like James Coburn, George Kennedy and Walther Matthau.  These three actors were solid in their portrayal making the film interesting to watch.  And we liked the French police inspector, Inspector Edouard Grandpierre.  We liked his presence here and how we wished he was given more screentime.

If you like film classics, and a bit picky on what to watch from the era, we would gladly suggest this one.  Breakfast at Tiffany's (another Hepburn classic) is available in Netflix, however Charade isn't.  We can find Charade being streamed in YouTube for free.


Another classic with Audrey Hepburn for you - Charade (1963)

Read More


By far is the oldest movie we have watched and reviewed to date.  We love Audrey Hepburn that we had to scrounge a bit to find a full movie version of that famous movie, Breakfast at Tiffany's.  After all that search, it was all along shown on Netflix.

Breakfast at Tiffany's showcases a girl named Holly Golightly's search for financial bliss in 1960s New York City.  She tried all kinds of things to earn her keep and achieve being rich.  She has lots of rich friends hoping to wed anyone just to level up in society until she met an intriguing neighbor in Paul Varjak played by George Peppard.

Holly doesn't have a stable job so shes scraping all the menial income she can get her hands on.  Meanwhile Paul is a struggling writer who is "kept" by a wealthy woman.  Two persons struggling in life meeting in one building was destiny we believe and somehow both were interested in each other.  They are cozy with each other yet romantic wise, they won't even try as both were still trying to achieve their financial freedom in a timely manner.

It was Paul who eventually confessed his love for Holly that even with the meager income and wealth he had, he promised to love Holly till the end.  She did was starting to love Paul however he could not give the wealth she desperately wanted. So she shied away from Paul's advances and went as far as driving him away.




Divulging not most of the details, all that pushing away by Holly could stop Paul from not loving her.  He did love her and he understands why Holly would not accept him.  But as if they were pre destined for each other, life has a funny way of biting Holly in the butt.  In the end of the film, they were finally together.  There I gave away a huge spoiler.  Even with that information, this movie is something to watch .  This may not be your typical romantic movie, but it has its own charm and yes, Aubrey Hepburn is in it.  You got to watch it.

Just one caveat though, we didn't like Mickey Rooney here.  So take him with a grain of salt, hell you might not even recognize him here in this movie.  Just watch the film for what its worth and we guarantee you its a nice watch for a film of that era.  It's not cheesy and not boxy like other classical films, we can say that even a 1960 film can be timeless in its directorial interpretation of this ageless story line.





Breakfast anyone? - Breakfast at Tiffany's (1961)

Read More

Copyright © Pinoy Movie Club | Designed With By Blogger Templates
Scroll To Top